marketing 15 Apr 2026
marketing 13 Apr 2026
Q1. The industry is clearly moving away from fragmented martech stacks. What are the main limitations you've observed with traditional setups involving DMPs, CDPs, and data clean rooms?
These tools were never designed to work together; they were built to solve different problems for different segments of the media industry at different points in time. DMPs were built mainly for publishers navigating the third-party cookie era. CDPs came along to fix the
single-customer-view problem for brands internally. Data clean rooms were adopted in response to signal loss across the board by brands, publishers, and retailers alike. So you’re looking at three separate architectures, three vendor relationships, three data pipelines.
What we hear constantly from publishers and retailers is that stitching these together creates enormous operational drag. Every handoff between tools is a point of latency, a potential compliance risk, and a cost center. And because none of them were built with collaboration in mind from the start, the moment you try to do something cross-party (enrichment with a partner's data, joint measurement, audience activation beyond your own properties, etc.) you hit a wall. The stack simply wasn't designed for the collaboration era, and even less for AI.
Q2. What is driving organizations to adopt more unified and flexible data platforms today, and how urgent is this shift?
Three pressures are converging simultaneously, which is what makes this moment feel different from earlier transitions.
First, regulation has fundamentally changed what's permissible. GDPR and a growing body of case law have made clear that moving customer data freely between systems is over: organizations need technical guarantees, not just contractual ones, for hassle-free and fast collaboration. Second, the signal environment has decreased: third-party cookies are declining, and universal identity solutions have helped at the margins but haven't filled the gap. Third and most importantly the value of first-party data is now demonstrably tied to collaboration. Data sitting in one organisation's DMP is interesting. Connected to a brand's CDP or a retailer's transaction history, it becomes genuinely powerful.
The media players moving now are building structural advantages. Those waiting are watching legacy DMP contracts come up for renewal with no clear answer for what replaces them.
Q3. From your perspective, what does a truly "unified" data platform look like in practice, beyond just integrating multiple tools?
"Unified" gets used to mean fewer vendor logos on a slide. That's not what I mean in this case necessarily.
A truly unified platform is one where the architecture was designed from the start for collaboration and privacy with the goal of creating networks between data owners, not just optimising data within a single organisation. When a CDP or DMP adds a clean room module, the privacy guarantees are only as strong as the wrapper. Additionally, you don't necessarily inherit any network here either, meaning each partnership might have to be built from scratch.
At Decentriq, we started from the opposite direction. Our clean room uses confidential computing: hardware-level encryption where data remains protected during processing, even from us. Using that as a foundation, we built the Collaborative Audience Platform: a unified layer adding CDP- and DMP-style capabilities segmentation, identity resolution, activation, shared audience products. In practice, a publisher can collect data, build and enrich audiences, activate to GAM or DSPs, run closed-loop measurement, and refresh automatically all in one environment, with no seams between layers. That's what genuinely unified looks like.
Q4. Many companies still rely on stitching together multiple solutions. Where do these approaches typically fall short when it comes to scalability and efficiency?
The failures tend to only become visible at scale, which is precisely when they're most painful.
The first is the identity tax. Every time data moves between tools, you make assumptions about identity resolution. If your system can only handle one ID type, you can lose a significant portion of your audience during matching. The second is engineering overhead: stitched integrations need constant maintenance, and onboarding each new partner is its own project, meaning there is a hard ceiling on how many collaborations you can run in parallel. The third, which comes up in almost every conversation with publishers replacing their DMP, is the inability to operationalize collaboration at scale. One-off clean room projects are feasible. Repeatable, automated, always-on audience collaboration with multiple partners simultaneously is a different problem (and stitched stacks weren't designed for it).
Q5. How is this shift impacting data collaboration between brands, publishers, and retailers in real-world scenarios?
The most significant change is the move from one-to-one integrations to network-based collaboration, because this changes the economics of data entirely and provides a crucial foundation for AI.
In the old model, a publisher ran a bespoke clean room project with one advertiser at a time. High cost, limited scale. A platform model enables something fundamentally different: standardised, repeatable collaborations across a growing network simultaneously. We've seen this with OneLog in Switzerland using our technology: five publishers unified under a single audience monetization platform, enabling advertisers to plan, activate, and measure across their combined audiences.
We're seeing the same dynamic for retailers. Decentriq's Collaborative Audience Platform lets them build audiences from online and offline signals and activate with brands and premium publishers (including CTV) without raw transactional data ever leaving their control. For brands, this means accessing publisher and retailer audience data through a standardized, privacy-safe workflow instead of negotiating lots of separate agreements.
Q6. Privacy and compliance remain key concerns. How do modern unified platforms address these challenges more effectively than legacy martech stacks?
Legacy stacks address privacy primarily through contracts — data processing agreements, retention policies. These are necessary but not sufficient. Contracts tell you what should happen; they don't technically prevent what shouldn't.
Decentriq uses confidential computing as the central technology for data collaboration: a hardware-level technology where data is processed inside a secure enclave inaccessible to any party, including us. The privacy guarantee is technical, not contractual. A significant recent CJEU ruling validated exactly this approach: clarifying that pseudonymised data processed through technology where re-identification is technically impossible carries a different compliance profile than data protected only by agreement.
For organizations navigating GDPR, this shifts the burden dramatically: instead of documenting every data flow and relying on ongoing contractual enforcement, you can demonstrate provable technical compliance. That's increasingly what regulators, legal teams, and enterprise procurement are demanding.
Q7. What role does AI and automation play in enabling more seamless and actionable data collaboration within these new ecosystems?
The critical point is where AI runs. AI operating on raw data is a privacy risk. AI operating inside a confidential computing environment on data that is never exposed is a fundamentally different proposition.
At Decentriq, AI is embedded at several levels: lookalike modelling that extends a seed audience without either party revealing their underlying data (a luxury automotive brand saw
+80% engagement and +58% conversion rate using this, for example), audience size estimation before a segment is built, and automated refresh cycles that keep audiences current across partners without manual intervention.
Further out, the more AI is integrated into these environments, the more the collaboration network itself learns from joint activations, measurement results, and partner interactions rather than resetting with each new campaign. That's the direction this is heading.
Q8. Looking ahead, what key changes do you expect in how organizations approach data infrastructure and collaboration over the next 2–3 years?
Three shifts feel clear.
First, stack consolidation. Organisations running separate DMPs, CDPs, and clean rooms will consolidate around platforms that do two, if not all three three, natively. The maintenance cost, compliance complexity, and operational drag will drive that decision.
Second, the ecosystem model becomes the norm. The value of first-party data is increasingly defined not by how much you have, but by how well it connects. Publishers contributing audiences to a collaborative network unlock revenue that's unavailable to those working in isolation. Retailers whose data can activate across a premium publisher network and close the loop with sales measurement are in a completely different competitive position. That logic will only accelerate. And as AI becomes more deeply embedded in these workflows, the network itself becomes a training asset: the more data flows through a shared collaborative infrastructure, the smarter and more precise the models that power lookalike targeting, audience estimation, and measurement become. Isolated stacks simply can't compete with that.
Third, privacy-preserving infrastructure shifts from differentiator to baseline expectation. Confidential computing and hardware-level privacy guarantees are currently seen as advanced or optional. In 2–3 years, driven by regulation, enterprise procurement standards, and demonstrated risk of alternatives, they'll be standard requirements. The organisations betting on these foundations now will be ahead of that curve rather than catching up to it.
marketing 10 Apr 2026
Nearly all organizations have adopted some sort of AI tool (if not multiple), but many say that the ROI isn’t there. Why is this happening? What’s holding back B2B companies from seeing true success with today’s advanced AI tools?
AI doesn’t fix broken systems. It accelerates them.
That’s the core problem. Most organizations are dropping AI into environments that are already fragmented. Disconnected data. Siloed teams. Inconsistent workflows. Leaders expect AI to clean that up. It doesn’t. It amplifies whatever’s already there. If the foundation is messy, AI makes the mess bigger.
The second issue is intent. Too many companies treat AI as a tool to deploy rather than a decision to make about where it can actually move the business forward. So teams automate content, automate reporting, automate outreach, and then wonder why the numbers don’t improve. Automation without alignment isn’t progress. It’s just faster noise.
The organizations seeing real ROI started differently. They got clear on how marketing, sales, and customer data could work together first. Then they applied AI where it could sharpen a process or improve an outcome. That sequence matters.
Your 2026 Growth Imperatives suggest that the issues are not with the AI tools themselves, but the underlying data infrastructure. How can teams make their data as actionable as possible to keep up with modern businesses today?
Stop treating data like a reporting function. Start treating it like a decision engine.
Most B2B organizations aren’t short on data. They’re short on shared data. CRM, campaign platforms, sales tools, customer platforms are all collecting signals, but nobody’s looking at the same dashboard. Marketing interprets results one way. Sales interprets them differently. Customer Success is working from something else entirely. That’s not a data problem. That’s an alignment problem.
Making data actionable starts with one question across every team: which signals actually matter? Which accounts are engaging? What topics are moving buyers? Where is momentum building, and where are deals stalling? When teams agree on those answers and pull from the same source, data starts driving real decisions.
That’s the shift. Shared signals. Shared accountability. One view of what’s working.
How should B2B marketers be rethinking their brand-to-demand strategy to stay relevant and visible, given AI’s role in search?
Here’s the reality: many buyers are encountering a brand inside an AI-generated answer before they ever visit their website. That changes everything about how visibility works.
AI answer engines are now shaping first impressions. So the question marketers need to ask isn’t just “where do we rank?” It’s “is our content structured in a way that AI systems can actually interpret and surface?” If the answer is no, you’re invisible at the most important moment in the buyer’s journey.
Content needs to be clear, authoritative, and built around the exact questions buyers are asking.
And brand and demand can’t keep operating as separate functions. The brands that stay visible are the ones creating consistent, memorable signals over time, so that when a buyer is ready to move, there’s no question about who they think of first.
Your guide emphasizes that sales enablement should move away from sporadic sales training sessions. What should effective sales enablement training look like today?
One-time training creates short-lived energy and very little lasting change. Most organizations know this, and they keep doing it anyway.
The problem is that a standalone event can’t keep pace with how buyers actually behave. Sellers need continuous reinforcement tied to real conversations and real customer signals, not a slide deck from last quarter. Managers need to coach against what’s happening right now in the field, not what was happening six months ago when the last training was scheduled.
Effective sales enablement today is embedded in the operating system of the business. It’s tied to measurable outcomes. It shows up in how deals are reviewed, how feedback is delivered, and how teams are developed week over week. The strongest organizations don’t treat sales development as an event. They treat it as part of how the business runs.
Traditional lead generation models often prioritize volume over engagement. How is the rise of AI and interactive content changing what effective lead generation looks like in 2026?
Lead generation is no longer about volume. It’s about intent.
For years, teams measured success by how many contacts they captured, even when most of those contacts showed no real buying signals. That model is breaking down fast. Buyers expect immediate value and more control over how they engage. Handing over an email address in exchange for a gated PDF isn’t the exchange it used to be.
Interactive content and AI are changing the pattern. When a buyer engages with a conversational tool that gives them something useful right away, that’s a different signal than a form fill. AI helps teams read those signals and separate casual interest from real momentum, so the response can be personalized and timed correctly.
What does it actually mean to “operationalize AI” inside a revenue organization? What are some areas where many companies go wrong?
Operationalizing AI means it’s no longer a side project. It’s how the business actually runs.
In a revenue organization, that means AI is embedded across marketing, sales, and customer success, improving decisions, timing, and execution in real workflows, not just in pilot programs or innovation labs.
Most efforts stall for three reasons: poor data quality, fragmented systems, and a lack of operational enablement. Companies implement AI before the foundation is ready. And without a solid foundation, AI has nothing meaningful to build on.
The other common mistake is letting teams operate against different goals with different measurements. If Marketing, Sales, and Customer Success aren’t aligned on what success looks like, AI can’t bridge that gap. It will just automate the misalignment. Get the foundation right first. Shared goals, shared data, shared accountability. Then AI becomes a real accelerator.
marketing 7 Apr 2026
You’re stepping into the VP of Revenue role at Adora at a time when AI is rapidly reshaping marketing. What about Adora’s approach convinced you this was the right moment to make the move?
Almost every CMO today is being asked by their CEO how they're leveraging AI both now and in the future. What drew me to Adora is that we give marketers a genuine answer to that question without asking them to abandon what's already working. Adora preserves the marketer's control over performance measurement and brand integrity, while enhancing creative generation and execution to help brands sell more products, more efficiently. It's a tangible, low-disruption path to realizing the benefits of AI and that's a compelling story in a market full of noise.
Many platforms claim to use AI for performance marketing, how does Adora’s model actually give brands more direct control over outcomes, rather than abstracting decision-making away from them?
The key distinction is that Adora keeps the human in the loop by design. Brands retain the ability to approve or reject anything our AI produces, and they define the rules of what success looks like. That combination human intent guiding machine execution is still enormously powerful. AI doesn't replace the marketer's judgment; it amplifies it.
Creative is increasingly being talked about as the primary driver of performance, how is Adora operationalizing creative as a true performance lever rather than just a brand asset?
It starts with being precise about what you want the creative to do. If the goal is a click, the creative needs a reason to compel action an offer, a product launch, a limited-time moment. If the goal is brand awareness, the brief looks completely different. Adora helps brands connect creative decisions directly to business objectives, so every asset is built with a measurable outcome in mind, not just aesthetics.
As AI-driven automation increases, where do you see the balance between human strategy and machine-led execution evolving, particularly for brands focused on growth?
AI performs best when humans provide it with clear objectives and context. The world changes constantly, and AI can't yet anticipate the future on its own. When a brand knows a market shift is coming, or wants to get ahead of a change in consumer behavior, the ability to feed that strategic context into the machine is where the real competitive advantage lies. The brands that win will be the ones who treat AI as a highly capable partner not an autopilot.
From a revenue and go-to-market perspective, what are you prioritizing in your first 6–12 months to scale adoption and demonstrate real business impact for advertisers?
Getting the fundamentals right. We have a clear vision at Adora for where we can genuinely move the needle for the industry, and staying disciplined about that focus is essential. AI is a broad category, and it's easy to get pulled toward solving problems that aren't core to what you're built for especially when early revenue is on the table. But we're building relationships with brands that we intend to last for decades, not months. That means setting them up for real, sustained success from day one, which ultimately sets Adora up for the same.
marketing 7 Apr 2026
Digital 100 U.S., Similarweb’s annual ranking of the fastest-growing websites and apps, points to something more structural happening beneath the surface. Across consumer categories, the brands with the most sustained momentum aren't necessarily the loudest ones. They're the ones that have quietly become indispensable.
marketing 6 Apr 2026
marketing 6 Apr 2026
Vibe Marketing is a new era of marketing shaped by generative AI creativity, speed, and intelligence enabling marketers and executives to automate marketing campaigns from client brief to concepts, campaigns to optimization.
marketing 6 Apr 2026
Page 1 of 45
Building a Thriving Business Without Spending on Digital Ads
Interview Of : Cintia Gazola
From Fragmented Martech Stacks to Unified Data Platforms as a foundation for AI
Interview Of : Maximilian Groth
How AI and Data Are Rewriting B2B Growth Craig Dempster, CEO of Trilliad
Interview Of : Craig
Keeping Humans in the Loop: How Adora Is Turning AI Into a True Performance Engine for Marketers
Interview Of : Andrew Double
The Brands Winning Digital Growth Aren't Chasing Attention They're Building Habits
Interview Of : Victoria Mauriello
Corporate Event Engagement Has a New Baseline
Interview Of : Brian Gates